Federal authorities are offering a major cash incentive for actionable intelligence leading to the arrest and conviction of 54-year-old fugitive Michael Lizaso Marasigan, whose ties to Guam and the Philippines have turned a charity-bingo fraud conviction into an international manhunt.
VANCOUVER, BC, The FBI’s $150,000 reward for Michael Lizaso Marasigan has turned the fugitive’s disappearance into a public-pressure campaign, inviting anyone with credible information in Guam, the Philippines, or beyond to help federal authorities locate a convicted fraudster who vanished after court-approved medical travel.
The official FBI wanted profile for Michael Lizaso Marasigan states that the Bureau is offering a reward of up to $150,000 for information leading to his arrest and conviction, a significant amount that signals federal urgency in a nonviolent but financially devastating fraud case.
Marasigan, identified by the U.S. Department of Justice as a 54-year-old fugitive from Dededo, Guam, was sentenced in absentia on May 18, 2026, to 262 months in federal prison after being convicted in the $34 million Guam charity bingo fraud case.
The reward now transforms his absence into a shared law-enforcement problem, because every person who knows where he lives, who supports him, who helps him travel, or who communicates with him may hold information valuable enough to trigger a federal cash incentive.
The reward changes the psychology of silence.
Fugitives often depend on silence from family members, friends, acquaintances, business contacts, landlords, medical providers, drivers, bankers, and community members who may know something but hesitate to come forward.
A $150,000 reward changes that equation by making information measurable, valuable, and publicly encouraged by the federal government, particularly when the fugitive is already convicted and sentenced.
The FBI’s offer also reduces the space for passive loyalty, as people around a fugitive must decide whether silence is worth the legal, moral, and reputational risks that may accompany continued association.
In Marasigan’s case, the reward matters because the manhunt is not searching for an unknown suspect, since federal authorities have already identified the person, the case, the conviction, the failed return, and the sentence.
The unanswered question is where he is now, and the reward is designed to make that question harder for his support network to ignore.
The Philippines connection is central to the manhunt.
The Philippines is not a random location in the Marasigan case because the FBI states that he has ties to Guam and the Philippines, is a dual citizen of the United States and the Philippines, and holds passports from both countries.
Those details matter because they help explain why investigators and public reporting have focused attention on possible overseas contacts, family networks, medical access, travel history, and personal relationships connected to the Philippines.
Marasigan was granted a Stipulation to Travel that allowed him to go to the Philippines for medical reasons after his conviction, but authorities say he failed to return on the required date and stopped communicating with the court in June 2025.
That sequence transformed the Philippines from a medical-travel destination into the geographic center of a fugitive investigation.
The country may offer familiarity, language, family ties, and mobility, but those same factors also give investigators and tipsters a clearer map of where credible information may surface.
The FBI wants actionable intelligence, not rumors.
A reward of this size does not mean federal authorities are asking the public to speculate, chase, confront, or investigate Marasigan on their own.
The FBI reward is intended to generate actionable information that can help law enforcement locate, identify, and arrest the fugitive through lawful channels, not to encourage private citizens to take risks or interfere with an official operation.
That distinction matters because fugitive recovery depends on reliable details, including location, contacts, travel patterns, documents, communication channels, financial support, employment arrangements, or other verifiable information.
Rumors may spread quickly after a wanted notice, but law enforcement needs information that can be assessed, corroborated, and safely acted upon by trained authorities.
The reward is therefore a tool for intelligence collection, not a license for amateur pursuit.
The public wanted listing makes him harder to hide.
The FBI’s Most Wanted Fraudsters listing creates a searchable public record that follows Marasigan across borders, communities, institutions, and digital spaces.
His profile includes identifying information, charges, reward details, ties to Guam and the Philippines, citizenship status, passport information, language ability, and the caution that he should be considered an escape risk.
That public visibility matters because fugitives often depend on ordinary activities, including renting housing, accessing medical care, using phones, obtaining transportation, receiving money, or communicating with trusted contacts.
Once a federal wanted profile is widely circulated, those ordinary activities become exposure points because people may recognize the name, image, case facts, or reward announcement.
A fugitive can avoid a courtroom, but it is far harder to avoid every search result, social media post, news segment, and institutional background check that now carry his name.
The case began with charity, not violence.
Marasigan’s wanted status is especially notable because the underlying crime was not violent, but it carried serious public harm through fraud, money laundering, illegal gambling, and exploitation of a children’s medical-travel charity’s purpose.
Federal authorities say Hafa Adai Bingo, connected to the Guam Shrine Club, generated approximately $34 million in gross proceeds, while patrons were told the proceeds would help children and a guardian travel to Shriners Children’s for medical care in Hawaii.
Prosecutors said defendants diverted and laundered $10,750,804 in net bingo proceeds that should have gone to the Aloha Shriners, creating the financial basis for the court’s multimillion-dollar restitution order.
A Hawaii News Now report on FBI fraud fugitives with Hawaii ties noted that Marasigan was among fraudsters identified by the FBI in connection with a Shriners Hospital pitch involving children’s medical travel.
The reward is therefore not only about one missing man, but also about enforcing accountability in a case built on public generosity and vulnerable children.
The reward attaches to conviction and sentence.
The timing of the reward is important because Marasigan is not merely accused of misconduct while awaiting trial.
A federal jury convicted him in May 2025, and Chief Judge Frances Tydingco-Gatewood later sentenced him in absentia to nearly 22 years in prison, along with restitution, forfeiture, and mandatory assessment obligations.
That means the fugitive hunt is tied to a completed jury verdict and a formal sentence, even though Marasigan was not present when the court imposed the punishment.
The sentence also means that anyone helping him remain hidden is not simply shielding a person with unresolved accusations, but potentially assisting someone who has already been convicted and sentenced in federal court.
The reward turns the case into a direct question of custody because the judgment exists and now awaits enforcement.
The escape-risk warning heightens scrutiny.
The FBI profile warns that Marasigan should be considered an escape risk, a phrase that gives law enforcement partners and the public a clear reason to treat any sighting or contact seriously.
That warning reflects the allegation that he failed to return after being granted permission to travel for medical reasons, then ceased contact with court authorities before a warrant was issued on June 25, 2025.
An escape-risk label also affects how institutions may view him, as banks, employers, landlords, healthcare providers, transport operators, and community contacts may understand that ordinary interactions could become legally significant.
For anyone in the Philippines or Guam who recognizes him, the warning means that the safest course is not to confront him, but to report him immediately through official channels.
The FBI reward is built around information, not heroics, because the goal is lawful capture by authorities.
The reward may reach people closest to him.
Fugitive rewards often work because the people most likely to know a fugitive’s location are not strangers, but relatives, old associates, service providers, business contacts, landlords, drivers, neighbors, medical contacts, or former friends.
The Philippines connection makes this especially important because a fugitive with dual citizenship and local ties may rely on familiar networks rather than live in complete isolation.
Those networks may provide lodging, food, transportation, introductions, cash, phone access, medical support, or informal protection, whether knowingly or through partial information.
The reward gives those people a reason to reconsider silence, especially if they fear being pulled into legal exposure or public embarrassment by continued association.
A fugitive may trust a small circle, but federal reward money can make that circle smaller.
The manhunt depends on records and relationships.
Modern fugitive investigations rarely rely on a single dramatic tip, as law enforcement often combines public information with travel records, financial activity, communications, known associates, identity documents, immigration data, and local cooperation.
In Marasigan’s case, the publicly disclosed facts already identify a path from Guam to the Philippines via a court-approved medical travel arrangement, followed by alleged nonreturn and loss of contact with the court.
Those facts give investigators a timeline, a destination, a legal violation, and a set of possible support relationships to examine.
The reward adds public participation to that existing framework, creating a broader intelligence net around the fugitive.
The more people who know the official facts, the harder it becomes for a wanted person to rely on the complexity of the original fraud case to remain anonymous.
The amount signals a top-tier fraud priority.
A reward of up to $150,000 is sufficient to show that federal authorities view Marasigan as a serious fugitive, not a low-priority financial defendant who can disappear into the paperwork.
The FBI’s Most Wanted Fraudsters list was created to give major fraud fugitives greater public visibility, and Marasigan’s inclusion places the Guam case within that national enforcement strategy.
The reward also signals that white-collar fugitives can face the same public-pressure model used in other serious federal manhunts, particularly when cases involve community harm, vulnerable victims, laundering, and flight.
This matters because financial criminals sometimes assume that nonviolent cases attract less public urgency after sentencing.
The Marasigan reward challenges that assumption by turning a charity-bingo fraud conviction into a public international search.
The reward reinforces Guam’s demand for accountability.
Although the manhunt now points toward the Philippines, the original harm remains rooted in Guam, where Hafa Adai Bingo operated, and patrons believed they were supporting children’s medical travel.
The reward helps keep Guam’s case visible beyond the island, ensuring that the fraud does not fade simply because the lead defendant failed to appear.
For community members who followed the trial, the wanted listing and reward may feel like overdue recognition that the case deserves national attention.
For victims and intended beneficiaries, the reward is a reminder that the government has not treated the sentence as a symbolic judgment with no practical enforcement plan.
The money offered for information, therefore, carries emotional meaning as well as investigative value.
The financial judgments remain part of the pursuit.
Marasigan’s fugitive status is not only about prison custody, as the court also imposed $10,750,804 in joint-and-several restitution and a $5,871,493 forfeiture money judgment against him.
Those financial orders matter because the original fraud case centered on money that prosecutors said should have supported the Aloha Shriners and the purpose of children’s medical travel.
A fugitive who remains outside custody may also complicate restitution collection, asset tracing, forfeiture enforcement, and recovery of proceeds connected to the scheme.
The reward may therefore generate leads not only about Marasigan’s location, but also about how he is living, who is supporting him, and whether assets or money channels remain accessible.
Every fugitive needs resources, and resources often leave traces that law enforcement can follow.
The Philippines public may become decisive.
Because the FBI specifically identifies Marasigan’s ties to the Philippines, people in Filipino communities, local business circles, medical settings, immigration channels, travel networks, and expatriate communities may become important sources of information.
This does not mean anyone should assume guilt by association or target relatives, because lawful reporting must focus on credible information about the fugitive’s whereabouts or support structure.
However, a dual citizen with known ties cannot easily exist without contact points, particularly if he needs medical care, money, shelter, transportation, communications, or official documents.
The reward encourages those who have reliable information to step forward rather than remain passive observers.
In cross-border fugitive cases, local knowledge can become the missing piece that formal records alone cannot supply.
The case warns people against helping fugitives.
The reward also serves as a warning: anyone knowingly helping a wanted fugitive may create legal risk for themselves, especially if they provide false statements, conceal the fugitive’s location, move money, arrange travel, or obstruct lawful enforcement.
People who believe they are helping a friend or relative may not fully understand that their own conduct can become part of the investigation once a federal warrant and wanted notice are active.
The safest path for anyone with information is to report through official channels and avoid taking steps that could be interpreted as concealment, obstruction, or assistance.
This warning matters because fugitives often survive through ordinary acts of help that supporters try to minimize as personal loyalty.
Once a reward and a wanted profile exist, those acts may no longer look private.
The privacy boundary is unavoidable.
The Marasigan case again draws a sharp line between lawful privacy and unlawful evasion, especially for people who follow international mobility, second citizenship, and low-profile living strategies.
Lawful privacy protects individuals from harassment, stalking, extortion, public exposure, and unnecessary intrusion, while maintaining accurate records and respecting courts, banks, tax authorities, and immigration systems.
For lawful clients seeking controlled visibility, anonymous living strategies should remain grounded in compliance, secure communications, accurate documentation, lawful residence, and truthful disclosure where required.
Marasigan’s case sits on the other side of that line because a post-conviction failure to return does not create privacy, but public fugitive exposure.
Privacy narrows unnecessary visibility for lawful people, while flight expands visibility for people who ignore court authority.
Identity tools cannot defeat a federal reward.
Marasigan’s reported dual citizenship and passport access may have affected his ability to travel, but they do not erase his conviction, sentence, restitution order, forfeiture judgment, warrant, or FBI wanted listing.
Legal identity tools can support lawful mobility, family protection, documentation continuity, and private residence planning when they are government-recognized, truthful, and consistent with existing legal obligations.
For legitimate clients seeking continuity of compliant documentation, new legal identity planning must remain rooted in lawful records rather than in any attempt to avoid prosecution, sentencing, restitution, or arrest.
A passport may help a fugitive move temporarily, but a federal reward can turn every contact, document, transaction, and relationship into a potential point of exposure.
The Marasigan case proves that identity status is not immunity from accountability.
The reward makes the manhunt personal.
A public wanted notice can feel abstract until a large reward makes the decision personal for people who may know where a fugitive is hiding.
Someone who recognizes Marasigan may now weigh loyalty against money, fear against legal safety, and silence against the knowledge that sick children’s medical-travel funds were central to the underlying fraud case.
That is exactly why reward programs exist, because they change the incentives in the hidden social world surrounding a fugitive.
The reward does not guarantee immediate capture, but it increases pressure by raising the cost of silence and clarifying the value of information.
For Marasigan, the manhunt is no longer only a federal file; it is now a public matter awaiting someone with credible information.
The final lesson is that reward money shrinks hiding places.
The FBI’s $150,000 reward has escalated the hunt for Michael Lizaso Marasigan by turning his Philippines ties, dual citizenship, medical-travel nonreturn, Guam conviction, and 262-month sentence into a public call for actionable information.
The case shows how a local charity bingo fraud can become an international fugitive matter when a convicted defendant receives permission to travel abroad, fails to return, and leaves a federal judgment behind him.
The reward also reinforces that financial fugitives are no longer protected by the complexity of their crimes, because public wanted lists make fraud cases easier to understand and harder to ignore.
For Guam, the offer keeps attention on the patrons, the Aloha Shriners, the children’s medical-travel promise, and the millions of dollars said to be diverted from charitable use.
In 2026, Marasigan’s reward stands as a warning that a fugitive may cross an ocean, but once the FBI attaches a six-figure incentive to his capture, every relationship becomes uncertain, every support network becomes vulnerable, and every person with credible information becomes a potential turning point.
